It is essential that the hypotheses and design of epidemiological research studies use the best methods and knowledge to further understand issues of concern and exposure in the community. It is expected that all research has scientific merit, has a hypothesis that warrants study, is competently conducted, and produces findings that are the result of good scientific effort.


Propose an intervention to address an identified public health issue in your community of interest. Review a minimum of five previous intervention studies, and propose one intervention study that would be the best solution to address the problem and how you will manage implementation of the intervention.

Your proposed intervention should include the following information:

  • Background Information.
    • What is the intervention?
    • Why is this evidence translatable?
    • Who is the target population?
    • What is the rationale this intervention would be the solution to the problem?
  • Methodology.
    • Identify the study design.
    • Discuss the theoretical framework for the study.
    • Explain the implementation strategy.
    • Explain how collaboration will play a role in the implementation of this study.
    • Explain what data will be collected.
    • Explain how the data will be analyzed.
    • Discuss the potential ethical issues that may impact the intervention.
    • Discuss the IRB process for the study.
    • Include the proposed time to see the results of the intervention.
  • Results/Conclusion.
    • What are the expected outcomes and impact? Is the problem decreased or eliminated?
    • What are the conclusions of this study in addressing this problem?
    • What are the strengths and limitations of this study?
    • Who will you share the findings with?
    • How will these findings be disseminated?
  • Contingency steps should the proposed intervention method for the identified problem fail.
    • What would you change in your intervention strategy?
    • Would you conduct more research?
    • Would you try the intervention strategy again?
    • Would you choose another intervention? Why?
Document Format and Length

Format your proposal using APA style.

  • Use the APA Style Paper Template, linked in the assignment resources. An APA Style Paper Tutorial is also provided to help you in writing and formatting your plan. Be sure to include:
    • A title page and references page.
    • A 250–300-word abstract.
    • Appropriate section headings.
  • Your assignment should be 5–9 pages in length, not including the title page and references page.
  • Proposal Requirements

    The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Applying Epidemiological Methods to an Intervention Study Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

    • Design an appropriate intervention study to address an identified public health issue in a community of interest.
    • Identify potential ethical issues in a proposed research project.
    • Evaluate effectiveness of strategies used in previous intervention studies in addressing a public health issue.
    • Integrate interdisciplinary collaboration in the design of the proposed intervention study.
    • Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style

Expert Solution Preview

In this assignment, I will propose an intervention to address an identified public health issue in a community of interest. I will review a minimum of five previous intervention studies and propose one intervention study that would be the best solution to address the problem. Additionally, I will discuss how I would manage the implementation of the intervention.

To address the identified public health issue of increasing rates of diabetes in my community, I propose an intervention called “Healthy Lifestyle Intervention Program.” This evidence-translatable intervention involves promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors and providing education and support to individuals at risk or living with diabetes. The target population for this intervention is adults aged 18-65 with prediabetes or newly diagnosed diabetes.

This intervention would be the solution to the problem because it focuses on addressing the key risk factors for diabetes, such as poor diet, sedentary lifestyle, and lack of knowledge about diabetes management. By targeting these modifiable risk factors and providing individuals with the tools and support they need to adopt and maintain healthy behaviors, we can effectively prevent or delay the onset of diabetes and improve outcomes for those already diagnosed.

The study design for this intervention would be a randomized controlled trial (RCT). This design would allow for the comparison of the effects of the intervention with a control group, providing robust evidence of its effectiveness. The theoretical framework for the study would be based on the Social Cognitive Theory, which emphasizes the role of self-efficacy and social support in behavior change.

The implementation strategy for this intervention would involve a multidisciplinary team including healthcare professionals, registered dietitians, and exercise physiologists. The team would collaborate in delivering individual and group-based sessions, providing personalized diet and exercise plans, and offering ongoing support and education. The intervention would be implemented in community health centers and local recreation facilities to ensure accessibility.

Data collected for this study would include baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as measurements of dietary intake, physical activity levels, and glycemic control. The data would be collected through interviews, questionnaires, and medical tests. To analyze the data, descriptive statistics would be used to summarize the characteristics of the study population, and inferential statistics would be used to compare outcomes between the intervention and control groups.

Potential ethical issues that may impact the intervention include ensuring informed consent, maintaining confidentiality, and addressing any potential conflicts of interest among the research team members. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) process for the study would involve submitting a detailed research proposal outlining the study design, recruitment procedures, consent forms, and data collection methods. The proposed time to see the results of the intervention would be two years, allowing for sufficient follow-up to assess the long-term impact on diabetes incidence and management.

The expected outcomes of this intervention are a decrease in the incidence of diabetes among individuals at risk, improved glycemic control among those already diagnosed, and an overall improvement in lifestyle behaviors. The problem of increasing rates of diabetes would be effectively addressed by promoting healthier lifestyles and providing necessary support and education. The study’s conclusions would highlight the effectiveness of the Healthy Lifestyle Intervention Program in preventing and managing diabetes.

The strengths of this study include the use of a rigorous study design (RCT) and the integration of a multidisciplinary team. The randomization process would minimize bias, and the collaboration among different healthcare professionals would ensure comprehensive and individualized care. However, limitations may include challenges in participant recruitment and adherence to the intervention, as well as potential confounding factors not accounted for in the analysis.

The findings of this intervention study would be shared with various stakeholders, including healthcare providers, policymakers, and community organizations. The goal is to disseminate the knowledge gained from this study to inform future interventions and public health strategies. The findings would be shared through conference presentations, peer-reviewed publications, and targeted reports to relevant organizations and agencies.

In the event that the proposed intervention method fails to achieve the desired outcomes, several contingency steps can be taken. First, a thorough evaluation of the implementation process and barriers encountered would be conducted to identify areas for improvement. Modifications to the intervention strategy, such as enhancing the educational materials or intensifying the support provided, could be implemented. Additionally, further research could be undertaken to explore other potential interventions or refine the existing one based on the lessons learned from the initial study.

Note: The answer provided is a sample response to the given content description and does not represent an actual medical professor’s answer.